<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 2.5.2 Released, Uses No-License Evaluation Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ingilizce tercÃ¼man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-270045</link>
		<dc:creator>ingilizce tercÃ¼man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-270045</guid>
		<description>Your comment contains very useful information about all thank you &lt;a href="http://www.xn--ingilizcetercman-vzb.com" title="ingilizce tercÃ¼me" rel="nofollow"&gt;ingilizce terc&#252;man&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment contains very useful information about all thank you <a href="http://www.xn--ingilizcetercman-vzb.com" title="ingilizce tercÃ¼me" rel="nofollow">ingilizce terc&uuml;man</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obfuscator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-13660</link>
		<dc:creator>Obfuscator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-13660</guid>
		<description>Hi Giorgio,

We are sorry to hear you are having problems with ReSharper. If you have posted any requests at our bug tracker, http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP, what are their numbers? Many bugs are fixed ASAP, so we would suggest that you wait for ReSharper 2.5.3, which will be out soon.

Also, Iâ€™m not sure what you mean by paying for ReSharper 3.0 Beta. Obviously, beta quality is not on the same level as an RTM release, and weâ€™ve never attempted to charge anyone for our Beta versions.

As far as upgrading, there are plenty of enhancements and new features for C#, including improved code analysis (code suggestions) and new productivity instruments (Go to Symbol, To-do list, and more). Please keep in mind that if you are not interested in Visual Basic, you will be able to purchase a separate C# Edition. Likewise, those who only work with VB.NET will be able to use a separate VB.NET Edition - at a fraction of the full price.

Thanks,
Obfuscator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Giorgio,</p>
<p>We are sorry to hear you are having problems with ReSharper. If you have posted any requests at our bug tracker, <a href="http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP" rel="nofollow">http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP</a>, what are their numbers? Many bugs are fixed ASAP, so we would suggest that you wait for ReSharper 2.5.3, which will be out soon.</p>
<p>Also, Iâ€™m not sure what you mean by paying for ReSharper 3.0 Beta. Obviously, beta quality is not on the same level as an RTM release, and weâ€™ve never attempted to charge anyone for our Beta versions.</p>
<p>As far as upgrading, there are plenty of enhancements and new features for C#, including improved code analysis (code suggestions) and new productivity instruments (Go to Symbol, To-do list, and more). Please keep in mind that if you are not interested in Visual Basic, you will be able to purchase a separate C# Edition. Likewise, those who only work with VB.NET will be able to use a separate VB.NET Edition - at a fraction of the full price.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Obfuscator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Galante</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-13591</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Galante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-13591</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think it's obsurd that folks that purchased Resharper 2.5 prior to April 2007 (such as myself, purchasing v2.5 in January) have to pay for the "upgrade." 2.5.X is so buggy (it throws exceptions every 2-3 hours) and the beta of 3.0 is certainly no more stable than 2.5, I won't be paying for it. Let alone the fact that 3.0 simply adds VB.NET support (be honest, there are hardly any noticeable updates in the C# space - certainly not worth paying for an upgrade.)

Good luck, I''ve just spent my money on DevExpress's toolset (Refactor! &#38; CodeRush) to replace Resharper - and at least I get a 1 year maintenance with that.

-Giorgio 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think it&#8217;s obsurd that folks that purchased Resharper 2.5 prior to April 2007 (such as myself, purchasing v2.5 in January) have to pay for the &#8220;upgrade.&#8221; 2.5.X is so buggy (it throws exceptions every 2-3 hours) and the beta of 3.0 is certainly no more stable than 2.5, I won&#8217;t be paying for it. Let alone the fact that 3.0 simply adds VB.NET support (be honest, there are hardly any noticeable updates in the C# space - certainly not worth paying for an upgrade.)</p>
<p>Good luck, I&#8221;ve just spent my money on DevExpress&#8217;s toolset (Refactor! &amp; CodeRush) to replace Resharper - and at least I get a 1 year maintenance with that.</p>
<p>-Giorgio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekua</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-12989</link>
		<dc:creator>thekua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-12989</guid>
		<description>Great. I look forward to using the next version!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. I look forward to using the next version!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-12188</link>
		<dc:creator>orangy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-12188</guid>
		<description>thekua,

Yes, it is almost the same Go To Symbol as in IDEA. It will be available starting from version 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thekua,</p>
<p>Yes, it is almost the same Go To Symbol as in IDEA. It will be available starting from version 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekua</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-12138</link>
		<dc:creator>thekua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-12138</guid>
		<description>Hi there. Thanks for the latest release. I noticed that in the feature list and in JIRA, Go To Symbol has been implemented. Is this is the same as ALT+CTRL+SHIFT+N in IntelliJ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there. Thanks for the latest release. I noticed that in the feature list and in JIRA, Go To Symbol has been implemented. Is this is the same as ALT+CTRL+SHIFT+N in IntelliJ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emlak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-12110</link>
		<dc:creator>emlak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-12110</guid>
		<description>thank you very nice topic, thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you very nice topic, thanks <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obfuscator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-11894</link>
		<dc:creator>Obfuscator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-11894</guid>
		<description>Hi Gunnlaugur,
Yeah, it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gunnlaugur,<br />
Yeah, it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnlaugur Briem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released-uses-no-license-evaluation-model/#comment-11872</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnlaugur Briem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/04/resharper-252-released/#comment-11872</guid>
		<description>Download page says build number 376 ... is this release exactly the same as 2.5.2 RC2 except for the version bump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Download page says build number 376 &#8230; is this release exactly the same as 2.5.2 RC2 except for the version bump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
