<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 3.0 EAP in Action:  VB.NET Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-253144</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-253144</guid>
		<description>I too am very disappointed that the licence I purchased in January is now effectively useless and will be charged as much as I paid in the first place if I want the latest features and support.  Given the terrible state of early 2.5 builds and the time I spent submitting bug reports that went towards the much more stable 2.5.3 I feel let down and angry.  Time to evaluate CodeRush methinks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am very disappointed that the licence I purchased in January is now effectively useless and will be charged as much as I paid in the first place if I want the latest features and support.  Given the terrible state of early 2.5 builds and the time I spent submitting bug reports that went towards the much more stable 2.5.3 I feel let down and angry.  Time to evaluate CodeRush methinks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obfuscator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13659</link>
		<dc:creator>Obfuscator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13659</guid>
		<description>Hi Giorgio,

We are sorry to hear you are having problems with ReSharper. If you have posted any requests at our bug tracker, http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP, what are their numbers? Many bugs are fixed ASAP, so we would suggest that you wait for ReSharper 2.5.3, which will be out soon.

Also, I'm not sure what you mean by paying for ReSharper 3.0 Beta. Obviously, beta quality is not on the same level as an RTM release, and we've never attempted to charge anyone for our Beta versions.

As far as upgrading, there are plenty of enhancements and new features for C#, including improved code analysis (code suggestions) and new productivity instruments (Go to Symbol, To-do list, and more). Please keep in mind that if you are not interested in Visual Basic, you will be able to purchase a separate C# Edition. Likewise, those who only work with VB.NET will be able to use a separate VB.NET Edition - at a fraction of the full price.

Thanks,
Obfuscator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Giorgio,</p>
<p>We are sorry to hear you are having problems with ReSharper. If you have posted any requests at our bug tracker, <a href="http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP" rel="nofollow">http://www.jetbrains.net/jira/browse/RSRP</a>, what are their numbers? Many bugs are fixed ASAP, so we would suggest that you wait for ReSharper 2.5.3, which will be out soon.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by paying for ReSharper 3.0 Beta. Obviously, beta quality is not on the same level as an RTM release, and we&#8217;ve never attempted to charge anyone for our Beta versions.</p>
<p>As far as upgrading, there are plenty of enhancements and new features for C#, including improved code analysis (code suggestions) and new productivity instruments (Go to Symbol, To-do list, and more). Please keep in mind that if you are not interested in Visual Basic, you will be able to purchase a separate C# Edition. Likewise, those who only work with VB.NET will be able to use a separate VB.NET Edition - at a fraction of the full price.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Obfuscator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Galante</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13594</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio Galante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13594</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think it's obsurd that folks that purchased Resharper 2.5 prior to April 2007 (such as myself, purchasing v2.5 in January) have to pay for the "upgrade." 2.5.X is so buggy (it throws exceptions every 2-3 hours) and the beta of 3.0 is certainly no more stable than 2.5, I won't be paying for it. Let alone the fact that 3.0 simply adds VB.NET support (be honest, there are hardly any noticeable updates in the C# space - certainly not worth paying for an upgrade.)

Good luck, I''ve just spent my money on DevExpress's toolset (Refactor! &#38; CodeRush) to replace Resharper - and at least I get a 1 year maintenance with that.

-Giorgio 

P.S.  Your CAPTCHA solution for posting entries is buggy and eats the content/body field when the user mangles the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think it&#8217;s obsurd that folks that purchased Resharper 2.5 prior to April 2007 (such as myself, purchasing v2.5 in January) have to pay for the &#8220;upgrade.&#8221; 2.5.X is so buggy (it throws exceptions every 2-3 hours) and the beta of 3.0 is certainly no more stable than 2.5, I won&#8217;t be paying for it. Let alone the fact that 3.0 simply adds VB.NET support (be honest, there are hardly any noticeable updates in the C# space - certainly not worth paying for an upgrade.)</p>
<p>Good luck, I&#8221;ve just spent my money on DevExpress&#8217;s toolset (Refactor! &amp; CodeRush) to replace Resharper - and at least I get a 1 year maintenance with that.</p>
<p>-Giorgio </p>
<p>P.S.  Your CAPTCHA solution for posting entries is buggy and eats the content/body field when the user mangles the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dstennett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13589</link>
		<dc:creator>dstennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13589</guid>
		<description>Nick -- RS 3.0 will be out mid-June 2007 .... you're almost there.  You can download the Beta in the meantime at:

http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/beta.html

Best...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick &#8212; RS 3.0 will be out mid-June 2007 &#8230;. you&#8217;re almost there.  You can download the Beta in the meantime at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/beta.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/beta.html</a></p>
<p>Best&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13499</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 02:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13499</guid>
		<description>Any potential time frame for the 3.0 release based on your current standing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any potential time frame for the 3.0 release based on your current standing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwarkwoo young</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13209</link>
		<dc:creator>kwarkwoo young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 09:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13209</guid>
		<description>How the toe to do the environment setting up.
We did menu.
A next and error content 

Cannot locate Microsft Visual Studio.Net 2003. This software
is required in order to install ReSharper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the toe to do the environment setting up.<br />
We did menu.<br />
A next and error content </p>
<p>Cannot locate Microsft Visual Studio.Net 2003. This software<br />
is required in order to install ReSharper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwarkwoo young</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13208</link>
		<dc:creator>kwarkwoo young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13208</guid>
		<description>visual stdio.net 2003ì„ install and .jetBranis ReSharper install
next errror content

Cannot locate Microsft Visual Studio.Net 2003. This software
is required in order to install ReSharper

what error 
how configrations

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>visual stdio.net 2003ì„ install and .jetBranis ReSharper install<br />
next errror content</p>
<p>Cannot locate Microsft Visual Studio.Net 2003. This software<br />
is required in order to install ReSharper</p>
<p>what error<br />
how configrations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dstennett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>dstennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13088</guid>
		<description>Stephen:

In short, the C# IDE has been on hold for some time now ... please see further discussion at:

http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=266968&#38;tstart=0

David Stennett
Team JetBrains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen:</p>
<p>In short, the C# IDE has been on hold for some time now &#8230; please see further discussion at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=266968&amp;tstart=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=266968&amp;tstart=0</a></p>
<p>David Stennett<br />
Team JetBrains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13087</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2007/05/make-visual-basicnet-development-quicker-and-easier-with-resharper/#comment-13087</guid>
		<description>what\'s happening w/ the C# IDE?  I thought this would be in place of Resharper 3.0?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what\&#8217;s happening w/ the C# IDE?  I thought this would be in place of Resharper 3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

