<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create an overloaded delegate quickly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yuriy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/#comment-272838</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuriy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/#comment-272838</guid>
		<description>What about creating overloaded metod by removing a parameter and calling old versions with default parameter value?  

Last R# 4 builds create overload n wrong direction (as for me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about creating overloaded metod by removing a parameter and calling old versions with default parameter value?  </p>
<p>Last R# 4 builds create overload n wrong direction (as for me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/#comment-272305</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2008/03/extract-overloaded-method/#comment-272305</guid>
		<description>"Delegate" seems like a poor choice of works for something that generates .NET code but has nothing to do with a .NET delegate.

"Create new CreateUser overload and call selected CreateUser" seems like it better describes what will happen without using the much overloaded word "delegate".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Delegate&#8221; seems like a poor choice of works for something that generates .NET code but has nothing to do with a .NET delegate.</p>
<p>&#8220;Create new CreateUser overload and call selected CreateUser&#8221; seems like it better describes what will happen without using the much overloaded word &#8220;delegate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
