<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 5.0: Intro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CSharpDev</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305572</link>
		<dc:creator>CSharpDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305572</guid>
		<description>Trevor, I agree completely that if you have a top of the line 64-bit machine with at least 6Gb of ram, the response from Resharper is acceptable on small projects.  Unfortunately, not everybody is working on tiny projects or has the luxury of getting their IT department to buy brand new computers every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor, I agree completely that if you have a top of the line 64-bit machine with at least 6Gb of ram, the response from Resharper is acceptable on small projects.  Unfortunately, not everybody is working on tiny projects or has the luxury of getting their IT department to buy brand new computers every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Goertzen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305204</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Goertzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305204</guid>
		<description>R# 4.5 ran fast on every machine I've used it on.  Maybe it's time to upgrade that 486, Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R# 4.5 ran fast on every machine I&#8217;ve used it on.  Maybe it&#8217;s time to upgrade that 486, Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305159</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305159</guid>
		<description>I have been using resharper since version 1, and saw performance and stability get worse with each release.  I completely stopped using it at version 4.5, because in spite of promises to work on performance it was still terrible.  Now a new version 5 with more and more features to bog the IDE down.  Too bad the emphasis is so strongly on new features and not on making existing features stable.  I won't be using version 5.  I miss Resharper, but will probably never use it again.  Thanks, Jetbrains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using resharper since version 1, and saw performance and stability get worse with each release.  I completely stopped using it at version 4.5, because in spite of promises to work on performance it was still terrible.  Now a new version 5 with more and more features to bog the IDE down.  Too bad the emphasis is so strongly on new features and not on making existing features stable.  I won&#8217;t be using version 5.  I miss Resharper, but will probably never use it again.  Thanks, Jetbrains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Бюро находок #5 &#124; С кодом по жизни.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305083</link>
		<dc:creator>Бюро находок #5 &#124; С кодом по жизни.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305083</guid>
		<description>[...] Resharper 5.0 – Пока только анонс. Главные изменения: улучшенная поддержка Web Development. Поддержка Visual Studio 2010. Трансформация перечислений в LINQ выражения. Пакетная модификация больших приложений, поиск по коду и улучшенная навигация. (Вот на это бы я посмотрел, хотя пакетная модификация – звучит угрожающе.) EAP версия будет доступна в течении месяца. Надеюсь. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Resharper 5.0 – Пока только анонс. Главные изменения: улучшенная поддержка Web Development. Поддержка Visual Studio 2010. Трансформация перечислений в LINQ выражения. Пакетная модификация больших приложений, поиск по коду и улучшенная навигация. (Вот на это бы я посмотрел, хотя пакетная модификация – звучит угрожающе.) EAP версия будет доступна в течении месяца. Надеюсь. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305016</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305016</guid>
		<description>Yeap, I've missed you guys :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeap, I&#8217;ve missed you guys <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #452</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-305006</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #452</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-305006</guid>
		<description>[...] ReSharper 5.0: Intro - Looks like the first preview releases of ReSharper 5 are just around the corner, and the V5 product aims to support VS2010 as well as 2008, improved web development support along with the usual improvements to the code analysis it performs. Tim Barcz has had his hands on an early copy as he is a JetBrains .NET Academy Experts member and talks about Resharper 5.0 - Bookmarks , a new feature to aid code exploration. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReSharper 5.0: Intro - Looks like the first preview releases of ReSharper 5 are just around the corner, and the V5 product aims to support VS2010 as well as 2008, improved web development support along with the usual improvements to the code analysis it performs. Tim Barcz has had his hands on an early copy as he is a JetBrains .NET Academy Experts member and talks about Resharper 5.0 - Bookmarks , a new feature to aid code exploration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luedi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-304942</link>
		<dc:creator>luedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-304942</guid>
		<description>hope you take an eye on performance and VB functionality too. Performance is a little bit poor on large VB files. Also there are some things which don't work correct in VB (e.g. formatting on code cleanup, mixing tabs and spaces when generating properties or insert live templates).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope you take an eye on performance and VB functionality too. Performance is a little bit poor on large VB files. Also there are some things which don&#8217;t work correct in VB (e.g. formatting on code cleanup, mixing tabs and spaces when generating properties or insert live templates).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luedi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-304941</link>
		<dc:creator>luedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-304941</guid>
		<description>hope you will take an eye on performance an Visual Basic functionality too. Performance on VB in 4.5 could be better and there are a lot small issues which don't work correct (e.g  formatting on code cleanup, trouble with spaces and tabs when applying live templates or generate properties...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hope you will take an eye on performance an Visual Basic functionality too. Performance on VB in 4.5 could be better and there are a lot small issues which don&#8217;t work correct (e.g  formatting on code cleanup, trouble with spaces and tabs when applying live templates or generate properties&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-304933</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-304933</guid>
		<description>Any chance of 5.0 fixing the problems with the "Color Color" pattern (property with the same name as its type)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of 5.0 fixing the problems with the &#8220;Color Color&#8221; pattern (property with the same name as its type)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2009/10/resharper-50-intro/#comment-304926</link>
		<dc:creator>orangy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=271#comment-304926</guid>
		<description>Adam, this is not planned for ReSharper 5. If you can submit request to our issue tracker, we will consider it for future versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, this is not planned for ReSharper 5. If you can submit request to our issue tracker, we will consider it for future versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

