<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Release Day: ReSharper 5.1.1; dotCover and dotTrace RCs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-320236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-320236</guid>
		<description>@Jim
I don't think so because seems like the bugs are not reported to our issue tracker.
Please file two different bug reports describing the bugs in detail to youtrack.jetbrains.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim<br />
I don&#8217;t think so because seems like the bugs are not reported to our issue tracker.<br />
Please file two different bug reports describing the bugs in detail to youtrack.jetbrains.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-320213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-320213</guid>
		<description>Does this fix the bug where it says you can't use constants in non-static context?

ie

if(Someform.show(xxx)== DialogResult.No )
gives an error

or saying event handlers can be made static, when it can't because it's used in a different partial class file?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this fix the bug where it says you can&#8217;t use constants in non-static context?</p>
<p>ie</p>
<p>if(Someform.show(xxx)== DialogResult.No )<br />
gives an error</p>
<p>or saying event handlers can be made static, when it can&#8217;t because it&#8217;s used in a different partial class file?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-317515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-317515</guid>
		<description>@Lars

Thanks for your compliments!
We'll think about an Eclipse-compatibility layout but I really can't commit to anything in this area. First of all, you know that in addition to ReSharper, we're also developing [IntelliJ IDEA&#124;http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/], don't you? :) Which kind of explains why we have a IntelliJ IDEA-compatible layout, to bring consistency over the whole stack of JetBrains development tools. Then again, creating and a new layout for Visual Studio is a bit of an effort. Anyway, we'll think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lars</p>
<p>Thanks for your compliments!<br />
We&#8217;ll think about an Eclipse-compatibility layout but I really can&#8217;t commit to anything in this area. First of all, you know that in addition to ReSharper, we&#8217;re also developing [IntelliJ IDEA|http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/], don&#8217;t you? <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Which kind of explains why we have a IntelliJ IDEA-compatible layout, to bring consistency over the whole stack of JetBrains development tools. Then again, creating and a new layout for Visual Studio is a bit of an effort. Anyway, we&#8217;ll think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-317511</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-317511</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

great work! Without resharper visual studio would not be usable for people coming from eclipse. Thx!

By the way can u ship along a visual-studio for eclipse-users (keysettings configuration)? That would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>great work! Without resharper visual studio would not be usable for people coming from eclipse. Thx!</p>
<p>By the way can u ship along a visual-studio for eclipse-users (keysettings configuration)? That would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316536</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316536</guid>
		<description>@Mike, Oleg,

Thanks for your feedback.

We're not planning to provide any special R#+dotCover bundle pricing at least until dotCover introductory price offering expires (January 1, 2011).
As soon as it does expire, we'll consider discounts for the bundle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike, Oleg,</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not planning to provide any special R#+dotCover bundle pricing at least until dotCover introductory price offering expires (January 1, 2011).<br />
As soon as it does expire, we&#8217;ll consider discounts for the bundle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Gerovich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316531</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Gerovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316531</guid>
		<description>Jura,
I would second what Mike is suggesting. Our company would be interested in R#+dotCover package at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jura,<br />
I would second what Mike is suggesting. Our company would be interested in R#+dotCover package at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meysam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316425</link>
		<dc:creator>Meysam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316425</guid>
		<description>i can’t live without Resharper…It is part of me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can’t live without Resharper…It is part of me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Strobel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316398</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Strobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316398</guid>
		<description>@Jura: I would personally like to see a ReSharper + dotCover bundle.  Offering a separate bundle of ReSharper + dotCover + dotTrace couldn't hurt either.  There might be less interest for the reasons you've stated, but you don't really lose anything if noone buys it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jura: I would personally like to see a ReSharper + dotCover bundle.  Offering a separate bundle of ReSharper + dotCover + dotTrace couldn&#8217;t hurt either.  There might be less interest for the reasons you&#8217;ve stated, but you don&#8217;t really lose anything if noone buys it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316395</guid>
		<description>@David,

What's your vision regarding a package? We've been thinking about it but the difficult thing is that dotTrace is probably not the kind of product that companies buy for every developer while ReSharper and dotCover are exactly like this.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on bundling options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David,</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your vision regarding a package? We&#8217;ve been thinking about it but the difficult thing is that dotTrace is probably not the kind of product that companies buy for every developer while ReSharper and dotCover are exactly like this.<br />
I&#8217;d appreciate your thoughts on bundling options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gardiner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/09/resharper-511-dotcover-rc-dottrace-4-performance-rc/#comment-316384</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gardiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1010#comment-316384</guid>
		<description>Would still like to see some options for a "package" deal for your .NET tools.

-david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would still like to see some options for a &#8220;package&#8221; deal for your .NET tools.</p>
<p>-david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

