<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 6 EAP is Open; Details on JavaScript Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bolo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-331002</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 07:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-331002</guid>
		<description>@Mike Ward
+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike Ward<br />
+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-330873</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 10:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-330873</guid>
		<description>Just moved to Visual Studio 2010 and whilst doing that I've upgraded to Resharper 6 and I must say it's really good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just moved to Visual Studio 2010 and whilst doing that I&#8217;ve upgraded to Resharper 6 and I must say it&#8217;s really good <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-329794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-329794</guid>
		<description>@Ash
Well yes, that was one false assumption (
I'll ask sales to contact you to find a mutually acceptable solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ash<br />
Well yes, that was one false assumption (<br />
I&#8217;ll ask sales to contact you to find a mutually acceptable solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash Eldritch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-329770</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash Eldritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-329770</guid>
		<description>Jura Gorohovsky said:
"We’ll announce free upgrades ~1 month before release. R# 6 release is currently scheduled for late Spring."

Argh! I bought three Resharper 5 licenses just now on the assumption that I'd get the free upgrade to 6... Is that not the case? If so, should I just get a refund and do without Resharper for a while?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jura Gorohovsky said:<br />
&#8220;We’ll announce free upgrades ~1 month before release. R# 6 release is currently scheduled for late Spring.&#8221;</p>
<p>Argh! I bought three Resharper 5 licenses just now on the assumption that I&#8217;d get the free upgrade to 6&#8230; Is that not the case? If so, should I just get a refund and do without Resharper for a while?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328790</guid>
		<description>@mattiasw
We're not planning to introduce F# support right now.
&lt;a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-178987" rel="nofollow"&gt;We'd like it to be implemented as a community plug-in&lt;/a&gt; though, if enough people are willing to contribute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mattiasw<br />
We&#8217;re not planning to introduce F# support right now.<br />
<a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-178987" rel="nofollow">We&#8217;d like it to be implemented as a community plug-in</a> though, if enough people are willing to contribute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattiasw</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328789</link>
		<dc:creator>mattiasw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328789</guid>
		<description>Nice to see that you will support JavaScript. 

Will there be basic support for F#? I do not expect refactoring. But, for example, in R# v5, not even Navigate-Go To Symbol finds F# functions. The only thing found seems to be F# types and classes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see that you will support JavaScript. </p>
<p>Will there be basic support for F#? I do not expect refactoring. But, for example, in R# v5, not even Navigate-Go To Symbol finds F# functions. The only thing found seems to be F# types and classes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328720</guid>
		<description>@Roberto
ReSharper 6 release is still scheduled for late Spring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roberto<br />
ReSharper 6 release is still scheduled for late Spring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328719</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328719</guid>
		<description>When do you plan to release resharper 6? mvc razor refactoring support is really urgent, lack of it basically makes resharper refactor obsolete since it wont changes your views</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do you plan to release resharper 6? mvc razor refactoring support is really urgent, lack of it basically makes resharper refactor obsolete since it wont changes your views</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328582</guid>
		<description>@Vasiliy
If you have JSDoc items set on a function, then you can see these items in Parameter info when calling this function.
Other than that, we're not currently planning to dive into this kind of support.
I'm expecting to write a follow-up blog post to let you and others know how we're going to develop JavaScript support further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vasiliy<br />
If you have JSDoc items set on a function, then you can see these items in Parameter info when calling this function.<br />
Other than that, we&#8217;re not currently planning to dive into this kind of support.<br />
I&#8217;m expecting to write a follow-up blog post to let you and others know how we&#8217;re going to develop JavaScript support further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasiliy Aksyonov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2010/12/resharper-6-eap-is-open-details-on-javascript-support/#comment-328575</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasiliy Aksyonov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=1218#comment-328575</guid>
		<description>/** String */ function doSomething(/** Element */ element) {
    var /** String */ something = "x";
    return elemen.innerText + something;
}

Or JSDoc (http://code.google.com/p/jsdoc-toolkit/) notation can be used:

/**
  * @param {Element} element
  * @return {String}
  */
function doSomething(element) {
    /** @var {String} */
    var something = "x";
    return elemen.innerText + something;
}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/** String */ function doSomething(/** Element */ element) {<br />
    var /** String */ something = &#8220;x&#8221;;<br />
    return elemen.innerText + something;<br />
}</p>
<p>Or JSDoc (http://code.google.com/p/jsdoc-toolkit/) notation can be used:</p>
<p>/**<br />
  * @param {Element} element<br />
  * @return {String}<br />
  */<br />
function doSomething(element) {<br />
    /** @var {String} */<br />
    var something = &#8220;x&#8221;;<br />
    return elemen.innerText + something;<br />
}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

