<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Async CTP Support in ReSharper 6.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-339131</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-339131</guid>
		<description>I think the performance of resharper is just fine. I'd rather see deeper analysis than faster performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the performance of resharper is just fine. I&#8217;d rather see deeper analysis than faster performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-337639</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-337639</guid>
		<description>Nice! Does it have some cool suggestion to use await in certain situations, for example, when handling an method returning task or something? Like foreach to linq, we get convert to async method? =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! Does it have some cool suggestion to use await in certain situations, for example, when handling an method returning task or something? Like foreach to linq, we get convert to async method? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri Nesteruk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Nesteruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336682</guid>
		<description>@john
This is only for C# and VB. ReSharper currently does not provide support for C++.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@john<br />
This is only for C# and VB. ReSharper currently does not provide support for C++.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336657</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336657</guid>
		<description>Is this for C++ only or it's work on C# and VB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for C++ only or it&#8217;s work on C# and VB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336643</guid>
		<description>@Matt
Do current 6.1 EAP builds have any outstanding bugs from 6.0 that are relevant to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt<br />
Do current 6.1 EAP builds have any outstanding bugs from 6.0 that are relevant to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336640</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336640</guid>
		<description>I'd really rather you fixed the bugs in 6.0, rather than adding support for a CTP that will probably end up changing. 

You released 6.0 to a deadline, rather than when it was ready, and it shows. I ended up uninstalling it and going back to 5.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really rather you fixed the bugs in 6.0, rather than adding support for a CTP that will probably end up changing. </p>
<p>You released 6.0 to a deadline, rather than when it was ready, and it shows. I ended up uninstalling it and going back to 5.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336619</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336619</guid>
		<description>I haven't tried the 6.1 nightly because I'm rather cautious about installing software that is not RTM, but I'll try this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried the 6.1 nightly because I&#8217;m rather cautious about installing software that is not RTM, but I&#8217;ll try this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336583</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336583</guid>
		<description>@Daniel
Apart from introducing some new features and improvements to existing functionality, 6.1 is first and foremost a bug and performance fix release. Indeed, we have received complaints on performance in version 6.0: we have already &lt;a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues?q=in%3A+rsrp+type%3A+{Performance+Problem}+Fix+versions%3A+6.1+%23Fixed+" rel="nofollow"&gt;fixed over 100 performance problems&lt;/a&gt;, and we're on our way to fixing &lt;a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues?q=in%3A+rsrp+type%3A+{Performance+Problem}+Fix+versions%3A+6.1+%23Unresolved+" rel="nofollow"&gt;~80 more&lt;/a&gt; for final 6.1 release.
That said, if you have tried a 6.1 nightly build and it didn't get any better for you performance-wise compared to 6.0, I urge you to provide us details about your performance problem as soon as possible so that we're able to actually fix it for 6.1. We typically request a &lt;a href="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+Performance+Profiling+Instructions" rel="nofollow"&gt;performance snapshot&lt;/a&gt; of VS+ReSharper in order to be able to solve a particular performance problem.
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel<br />
Apart from introducing some new features and improvements to existing functionality, 6.1 is first and foremost a bug and performance fix release. Indeed, we have received complaints on performance in version 6.0: we have already <a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues?q=in%3A+rsrp+type%3A+{Performance+Problem}+Fix+versions%3A+6.1+%23Fixed+" rel="nofollow">fixed over 100 performance problems</a>, and we&#8217;re on our way to fixing <a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues?q=in%3A+rsrp+type%3A+{Performance+Problem}+Fix+versions%3A+6.1+%23Unresolved+" rel="nofollow">~80 more</a> for final 6.1 release.<br />
That said, if you have tried a 6.1 nightly build and it didn&#8217;t get any better for you performance-wise compared to 6.0, I urge you to provide us details about your performance problem as soon as possible so that we&#8217;re able to actually fix it for 6.1. We typically request a <a href="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+Performance+Profiling+Instructions" rel="nofollow">performance snapshot</a> of VS+ReSharper in order to be able to solve a particular performance problem.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/async-ctp-support-in-resharper-61/#comment-336569</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2327#comment-336569</guid>
		<description>I think the first priority is to improve dramatically the performance of 6.0.
With VS 2010 it is *appalling*, especially in js and Razor files.

On a quad-core laptop @ 2.5GHz, with 8 GB of RAM, SSD disk, it is very, very slow.

If the performance stays the same, I'm seriously considering giving up on using Resharper, even ask for a refund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the first priority is to improve dramatically the performance of 6.0.<br />
With VS 2010 it is *appalling*, especially in js and Razor files.</p>
<p>On a quad-core laptop @ 2.5GHz, with 8 GB of RAM, SSD disk, it is very, very slow.</p>
<p>If the performance stays the same, I&#8217;m seriously considering giving up on using Resharper, even ask for a refund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

