<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 6.1 EAP Opens: Much More than a Bugfix Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-338180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-338180</guid>
		<description>@Ian No chance unfortunately since ReSharper 6.1 was &lt;a href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/christmas-is-here-resharper-61-dotcover-12-and-dottrace-452-released/" rel="nofollow"&gt;released yesterday&lt;/a&gt;

Assemblies only used in using statements are detected as efficiently unused, yes.

As to a replacement to "Add reference &gt; project", can you further elaborate on that? What would you like to see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ian No chance unfortunately since ReSharper 6.1 was <a href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/christmas-is-here-resharper-61-dotcover-12-and-dottrace-452-released/" rel="nofollow">released yesterday</a></p>
<p>Assemblies only used in using statements are detected as efficiently unused, yes.</p>
<p>As to a replacement to &#8220;Add reference > project&#8221;, can you further elaborate on that? What would you like to see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-338178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-338178</guid>
		<description>Is there any chance that http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-244714 will get done in 6.1?

Can Optimize Assembly References detect references that are only used by a using statement?

A replace for add project reference that explains the cycle would also be nice; managing references on a large old project is a big pain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any chance that <a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-244714" rel="nofollow">http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issue/RSRP-244714</a> will get done in 6.1?</p>
<p>Can Optimize Assembly References detect references that are only used by a using statement?</p>
<p>A replace for add project reference that explains the cycle would also be nice; managing references on a large old project is a big pain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-337297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-337297</guid>
		<description>@Jack
We're looking to release a beta sometime in December, then we'll need a few more weeks to prepare the final build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack<br />
We&#8217;re looking to release a beta sometime in December, then we&#8217;ll need a few more weeks to prepare the final build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-337263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-337263</guid>
		<description>hi, when 6.1 will it release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, when 6.1 will it release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-336504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-336504</guid>
		<description>@Charles
Possibly. Need to know how the problem has been reported (bug report to the issue tracker, support request etc.) to provide a definite answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charles<br />
Possibly. Need to know how the problem has been reported (bug report to the issue tracker, support request etc.) to provide a definite answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Hooks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-336497</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Hooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-336497</guid>
		<description>Is the out of virtual memory problem fixed for x86 machines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the out of virtual memory problem fixed for x86 machines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-335609</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-335609</guid>
		<description>Async CTP and Optimize usage? 
DO WANT!

btw, we posponed Async usage in silverlight project due ReSharper was nt able to handle that, and everyone on the team give me "that look", if they want to write it without resharper support :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Async CTP and Optimize usage?<br />
DO WANT!</p>
<p>btw, we posponed Async usage in silverlight project due ReSharper was nt able to handle that, and everyone on the team give me &#8220;that look&#8221;, if they want to write it without resharper support <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-335442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-335442</guid>
		<description>@Hadi, @Paul, @Øystein, @Allan
Sorry for a delay with the guidelines. We thought, we'd publish a VSIX installer instead. Please see the fresh drop to the EAP page and download the VSIX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hadi, @Paul, @Øystein, @Allan<br />
Sorry for a delay with the guidelines. We thought, we&#8217;d publish a VSIX installer instead. Please see the fresh drop to the EAP page and download the VSIX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Kragh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-335428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Kragh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-335428</guid>
		<description>Great work! Definite speed improvements on my machine with the latest 6.1 build.

I'm new to resharper but it seems that when running an MS Unit test via resharper that the App.config does not get copied / read when running a test. I can run the same test under MS Test, and my test can read the app.config ok. 

Should I open a bug for the 6.1 EAP around this, or are there other steps that are usually taken for resharper to copy app.config files for unit tests?

Thanks,
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work! Definite speed improvements on my machine with the latest 6.1 build.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to resharper but it seems that when running an MS Unit test via resharper that the App.config does not get copied / read when running a test. I can run the same test under MS Test, and my test can read the app.config ok. </p>
<p>Should I open a bug for the 6.1 EAP around this, or are there other steps that are usually taken for resharper to copy app.config files for unit tests?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Michaelsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/11/resharper-61-eap-opens-much-more-than-a-bugfix-release/#comment-335422</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Michaelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2260#comment-335422</guid>
		<description>I would also like to have an install guide for VS11...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to have an install guide for VS11&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

