<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper 6.1: The Finish Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-338122</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-338122</guid>
		<description>Hmm, the Fixes link for nightly build 30 lists those bugs as fixed in that build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the Fixes link for nightly build 30 lists those bugs as fixed in that build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-338119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-338119</guid>
		<description>@Justin We're past the 6.1 inclusion deadline. The two fixes will apparently be available in the next ReSharper update after 6.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin We&#8217;re past the 6.1 inclusion deadline. The two fixes will apparently be available in the next ReSharper update after 6.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-338116</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-338116</guid>
		<description>RSRP-286341 and RSRP-286345 both show fixed in 6.5 but the issues persist in the latest 6.1 nightly build.  Will the fixes for those bugs get merged into the 6.1 branch before 6.1 is released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSRP-286341 and RSRP-286345 both show fixed in 6.5 but the issues persist in the latest 6.1 nightly build.  Will the fixes for those bugs get merged into the 6.1 branch before 6.1 is released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-338098</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-338098</guid>
		<description>@Phil
Sorry but we don't currently support custom build actions at all, meaning that RSRP-284665 can't be implemented right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil<br />
Sorry but we don&#8217;t currently support custom build actions at all, meaning that RSRP-284665 can&#8217;t be implemented right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-338086</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-338086</guid>
		<description>RSRP-284665 is a show stopper for us.  Any chance this can be fixed?
RSRP-279821 is also a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RSRP-284665 is a show stopper for us.  Any chance this can be fixed?<br />
RSRP-279821 is also a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-337855</link>
		<dc:creator>orangy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-337855</guid>
		<description>@Mark, of course we have plans to support WinRT. The problem is there is no build suitable for integration work. Developer Preview has some critical API missing (or non-functional), so we are waiting for something to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark, of course we have plans to support WinRT. The problem is there is no build suitable for integration work. Developer Preview has some critical API missing (or non-functional), so we are waiting for something to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-337854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-337854</guid>
		<description>@Mark
Absolutely. Not in version 6 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark<br />
Absolutely. Not in version 6 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Monster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-337848</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-337848</guid>
		<description>Are you guys at Jetbrains planning to support WinRT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys at Jetbrains planning to support WinRT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura Gorohovsky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-337770</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura Gorohovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-337770</guid>
		<description>@Joe No that means that this particular change was initially committed to trunk before being merged to the 6.1 branch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe No that means that this particular change was initially committed to trunk before being merged to the 6.1 branch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper-61-the-finish-line/#comment-337755</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2387#comment-337755</guid>
		<description>@Jura: that root exception has a "Fixed in build" of 6.5.1.431. Does that mean it won't actually be fixed in the 6.1 release, and we'll be stuck with background analysis occasionally seizing up (now with no warning) until VS is restarted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jura: that root exception has a &#8220;Fixed in build&#8221; of 6.5.1.431. Does that mean it won&#8217;t actually be fixed in the 6.1 release, and we&#8217;ll be stuck with background analysis occasionally seizing up (now with no warning) until VS is restarted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

