Comments on: ReSharper 6.1 Settings: DropBox and Company-wide http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/ ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage Wed, 16 May 2012 20:57:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Hadi Hariri http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-345400 Hadi Hariri Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:36:32 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-345400 @Jimmy, Sorry I might be misunderstanding. What you're describing is how it works and the opposite of what Michael is asking for. But the second comment indicates that you do want them enforced? @Jimmy,

Sorry I might be misunderstanding. What you’re describing is how it works and the opposite of what Michael is asking for. But the second comment indicates that you do want them enforced?

]]> By: Jimmy http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-345394 Jimmy Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:50:05 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-345394 To extend, developers who only want their personal rules can simply not have a global layer, and if they are within a company that enforce settings then they shouldn't be able to override them in the first place, that seems like madness. To extend, developers who only want their personal rules can simply not have a global layer, and if they are within a company that enforce settings then they shouldn’t be able to override them in the first place, that seems like madness.

]]> By: Jimmy http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-345392 Jimmy Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:47:33 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-345392 I have to agree with Michael Fagré, I think the prioritisation is the wrong way around, and that you should apply the personal developers rules first and then the global rules afterwards, so that any rules which are not specified in the global rules inherit from the personal developers ruleset. Otherwise we'll need be able to enforce company wide settings as this blog suggests we can, it's simply not the case at present. I have to agree with Michael Fagré, I think the prioritisation is the wrong way around, and that you should apply the personal developers rules first and then the global rules afterwards, so that any rules which are not specified in the global rules inherit from the personal developers ruleset.

Otherwise we’ll need be able to enforce company wide settings as this blog suggests we can, it’s simply not the case at present.

]]> By: Ashwani http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-342078 Ashwani Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:32:01 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-342078 Hi Hadi, I have sent u a mail on this at hadi@jetbrains.com. kindly guide me on this. Hi Hadi,

I have sent u a mail on this at hadi@jetbrains.com.
kindly guide me on this.

]]> By: Hadi Hariri http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-342033 Hadi Hariri Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:33:13 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-342033 @Ashwani Yes it is. Shoot me an email (hadi at jetbrains) and I'll guide you on the classes you need to work with. @Ashwani

Yes it is. Shoot me an email (hadi at jetbrains) and I’ll guide you on the classes you need to work with.

]]> By: Ashwani http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-342031 Ashwani Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:00:46 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-342031 Hi All, Is it possible to add a layers in Mange Option using Resharper SDk through C# macro or add ins ? Hi All,

Is it possible to add a layers in Mange Option using Resharper SDk through C# macro or add ins ?

]]> By: Hadi Hariri http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-341391 Hadi Hariri Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:36:52 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-341391 @adlangx, Yes, in the final it was changed for This Computer @adlangx,

Yes, in the final it was changed for This Computer

]]> By: adlangx http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-341330 adlangx Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:06:27 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-341330 I do not see a Resharper Global Settings Group. Is it the This Computer group instead? I do not see a Resharper Global Settings Group. Is it the This Computer group instead?

]]> By: BlueScreen http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-341028 BlueScreen Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:33:19 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-341028 Hello, the resharper settings manager for 5.1. was all about enforcing settings. This was excatly what we needed. Now with the new 6.1. every developer can override anything he wants. That is not sharing settings, it can just result in pure chaos. I was not able to set up some setting structure to prevent overriding critical settings, which is a shame :( I simply can not see why this very often asked for feature is not implemented. The logic is so simple: take this settings file in this path where all settings available are saved (not just changed ones) and voila. Hello,
the resharper settings manager for 5.1. was all about enforcing settings. This was excatly what we needed. Now with the new 6.1. every developer can override anything he wants. That is not sharing settings, it can just result in pure chaos.
I was not able to set up some setting structure to prevent overriding critical settings, which is a shame :(
I simply can not see why this very often asked for feature is not implemented.
The logic is so simple: take this settings file in this path where all settings available are saved (not just changed ones) and voila.

]]> By: Hadi Hariri http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2011/12/resharper61-settings-dropbox-and-company-wide/#comment-340034 Hadi Hariri Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:36:12 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2353#comment-340034 @Michael, Sorry for the delay. Somehow missed this. As I mentioned earlier, we do not enforce people overriding policies. As such if someone does override a certain setting they shouldn't it will take preference. But this also has a positive side which is, things that are not company policy can be adjusted to each developer's needs. The issue of the saving modifying something the user is not aware of is somewhat of a problem and we're hoping to address that in the next versions. @Michael,

Sorry for the delay. Somehow missed this. As I mentioned earlier, we do not enforce people overriding policies. As such if someone does override a certain setting they shouldn’t it will take preference. But this also has a positive side which is, things that are not company policy can be adjusted to each developer’s needs.

The issue of the saving modifying something the user is not aware of is somewhat of a problem and we’re hoping to address that in the next versions.

]]>