<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit Testing Improvements in ReSharper 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Kurakin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-448717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Kurakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-448717</guid>
		<description>/// &#60;reference path="path/to/qunit-1.11.0.js" /&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/// &lt;reference path=&#8221;path/to/qunit-1.11.0.js&#8221; /&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Kurakin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-448716</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Kurakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-448716</guid>
		<description>@Lee, you may try out to add the following reference to the top of your js file with tests: 
/// . 

In this case, ReSharper will use this qUnit version to run the tests. However, please note if there are any API changes in this qUnit version, there is a chance ReSharper won't support it. 

Please let us know about the results. 
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lee, you may try out to add the following reference to the top of your js file with tests:<br />
/// . </p>
<p>In this case, ReSharper will use this qUnit version to run the tests. However, please note if there are any API changes in this qUnit version, there is a chance ReSharper won&#8217;t support it. </p>
<p>Please let us know about the results.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-448713</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-448713</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to update the version of qunit in Resharper (&#62;7)?

I'm getting errors running some tests and would like to use the latest version of qunit.

Thanks
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to update the version of qunit in Resharper (&gt;7)?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting errors running some tests and would like to use the latest version of qunit.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Speaker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-431922</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Speaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 01:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-431922</guid>
		<description>Dan Flores question above is right on.

I'm not seeing a way to specify that the tests should not run using the dynamic ports on the development server. The tests, when simply run in a browser (specrunner.html) can reference source js files via relative path allowing a separate project folder for jasmine tests to be used.  This of course is appropriate for enterprise dev. 

Running phantomjs or browsers via Resharper7/VS seems to have me locked to dynamic ports and dev server.

Is there config or options I'm missing? Or, is this just written such that the test js really does have to live along-side production code?

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Flores question above is right on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not seeing a way to specify that the tests should not run using the dynamic ports on the development server. The tests, when simply run in a browser (specrunner.html) can reference source js files via relative path allowing a separate project folder for jasmine tests to be used.  This of course is appropriate for enterprise dev. </p>
<p>Running phantomjs or browsers via Resharper7/VS seems to have me locked to dynamic ports and dev server.</p>
<p>Is there config or options I&#8217;m missing? Or, is this just written such that the test js really does have to live along-side production code?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Kropp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-385142</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Kropp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-385142</guid>
		<description>It is not yet supported. Please vote &#038; watch corresponding request http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-330187</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not yet supported. Please vote &#038; watch corresponding request <a href="http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-330187" rel="nofollow">http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-330187</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-385129</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-385129</guid>
		<description>Is debugging JS tests using PhantomJS supported?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is debugging JS tests using PhantomJS supported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Kropp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-384077</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Kropp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-384077</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately TypeScript is not yet supported. When it will be fully supported by ReSharper, it will include support for Unit Testing Frameworks as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately TypeScript is not yet supported. When it will be fully supported by ReSharper, it will include support for Unit Testing Frameworks as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: typeasec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-384053</link>
		<dc:creator>typeasec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-384053</guid>
		<description>Am trying to get unit tests running using ReSharper 7.1/VS2012/QUnit and TypeScript 0.8.1 but so far w/o luck prior building the Javascript and manually adding the reference to the tested JS.

Is ReSharper supposed to run with TypeScript in the above combination?
How to get rid of the manual inclusion of the reference to the JS post build if it is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am trying to get unit tests running using ReSharper 7.1/VS2012/QUnit and TypeScript 0.8.1 but so far w/o luck prior building the Javascript and manually adding the reference to the tested JS.</p>
<p>Is ReSharper supposed to run with TypeScript in the above combination?<br />
How to get rid of the manual inclusion of the reference to the JS post build if it is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fschwiet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-372104</link>
		<dc:creator>fschwiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-372104</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dmitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dmitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri Nesteruk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/07/unit-testing-improvements-in-resharper-7/#comment-368112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Nesteruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=2841#comment-368112</guid>
		<description>@fschwiet: &lt;a href="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/4.09+Test+Framework+Support+%28R7%29" title="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/4.09+Test+Framework+Support+%28R7%29" rel="nofollow"&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt; points to the latest reference on test framework support, though the two are likely to have identical content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fschwiet: <a href="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/4.09+Test+Framework+Support+%28R7%29" title="http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/ReSharper/4.09+Test+Framework+Support+%28R7%29" rel="nofollow">this link</a> points to the latest reference on test framework support, though the two are likely to have identical content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
