<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReSharper on the Server: Detecting Code Issues in the build</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/</link>
	<description>ReSharper for productivity, dotTrace for performance, dotCover for test coverage</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-440691</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-440691</guid>
		<description>Any news on the issues reported by Marcel? I'm getting Hints and Suggestions reported in TeamCity. It should only be Warnings and Errors leaving the Hints/Suggestions for coding, otherwise it becomes impossible to set a build tolerance check on warnings as the next hint generated breaks the build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on the issues reported by Marcel? I&#8217;m getting Hints and Suggestions reported in TeamCity. It should only be Warnings and Errors leaving the Hints/Suggestions for coding, otherwise it becomes impossible to set a build tolerance check on warnings as the next hint generated breaks the build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph12</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-373845</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-373845</guid>
		<description>It prevents using the same settings file as the developer is using.Thanks for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It prevents using the same settings file as the developer is using.Thanks for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadi Hariri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-372565</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadi Hariri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-372565</guid>
		<description>@Marcel,

We're looking into these issues.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marcel,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re looking into these issues.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadi Hariri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-372564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadi Hariri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-372564</guid>
		<description>@Immo, @John,

Currently it only runs under TeamCity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Immo, @John,</p>
<p>Currently it only runs under TeamCity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-372114</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-372114</guid>
		<description>The three issues that we are concerned about are:

TW-21471 .NET Inspections: Add Options to the Build Step Page: Only Check For Errors 
TW-22788 Inspection "DataContext is unknown" reported even though inspection severity set to "Do not show" 
TW-22126 .NET Inspections runner should not execute solution wide analysis in case it was disabled via R#'s settings profile 

The first one basically prevents using the same settings file as the developer is using. The second one makes TC show errors that we explicitly de-activated from reporting, ie. the error count could never go down to zero. For the third there is a work-around, one just needs to take care to misspell the config parameter properly ;-)

At least the first issue we reported for a 7.0 EAP version - so it takes a bit of time to get things fixed. I simply would propose to nicely wrap up existing functionality before jumping to the next cool thing (to ensure that TeamCity remains the best build server infrastructure).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The three issues that we are concerned about are:</p>
<p>TW-21471 .NET Inspections: Add Options to the Build Step Page: Only Check For Errors<br />
TW-22788 Inspection &#8220;DataContext is unknown&#8221; reported even though inspection severity set to &#8220;Do not show&#8221;<br />
TW-22126 .NET Inspections runner should not execute solution wide analysis in case it was disabled via R#&#8217;s settings profile </p>
<p>The first one basically prevents using the same settings file as the developer is using. The second one makes TC show errors that we explicitly de-activated from reporting, ie. the error count could never go down to zero. For the third there is a work-around, one just needs to take care to misspell the config parameter properly <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>At least the first issue we reported for a 7.0 EAP version - so it takes a bit of time to get things fixed. I simply would propose to nicely wrap up existing functionality before jumping to the next cool thing (to ensure that TeamCity remains the best build server infrastructure).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-372091</link>
		<dc:creator>John Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-372091</guid>
		<description>It would be wonderful if you could create custom activities for TFS 2010/2012 builds that perform the same functions as the TeamCity equivalents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be wonderful if you could create custom activities for TFS 2010/2012 builds that perform the same functions as the TeamCity equivalents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immo Landwerth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-372083</link>
		<dc:creator>Immo Landwerth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-372083</guid>
		<description>That looks really cool.

Are there any plans to make this feature available to non-TeamCity users as well? For example, we are using Team Foundation Server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks really cool.</p>
<p>Are there any plans to make this feature available to non-TeamCity users as well? For example, we are using Team Foundation Server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ellison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-371932</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-371932</guid>
		<description>What would be really helpful is a command line engine that can be integrated with any build system. I'd love our company to switch to Team City, but it's a big investment and not sure if and when it will happen. Before then Resharper is crippled by lack of integration with our existing build system - there is no way to enforce the rules at the build level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be really helpful is a command line engine that can be integrated with any build system. I&#8217;d love our company to switch to Team City, but it&#8217;s a big investment and not sure if and when it will happen. Before then Resharper is crippled by lack of integration with our existing build system - there is no way to enforce the rules at the build level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-371923</link>
		<dc:creator>coox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-371923</guid>
		<description>Actually, ReSharper does not save ignored issues currently. A workaround could be is to completely exclude files with such erros from analysis. You may do that in ReSharper &#124; Options &#124; Code Inspections &#124; Settings &#124; Edit items to Skip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, ReSharper does not save ignored issues currently. A workaround could be is to completely exclude files with such erros from analysis. You may do that in ReSharper | Options | Code Inspections | Settings | Edit items to Skip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadi Hariri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/2012/10/resharper-on-the-server-detecting-code-issues-in-the-build/#comment-371906</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadi Hariri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/?p=3613#comment-371906</guid>
		<description>@Marcel,

Can you please point out the issues on YouTrack? 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marcel,</p>
<p>Can you please point out the issues on YouTrack? </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
