<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IntelliJ IDEA 8 Refactorings: Wrap Return Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2008/11/intellij-idea-8-refactorings-wrap-return-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2008/11/intellij-idea-8-refactorings-wrap-return-value/</link>
	<description>tips &#38; tricks, news, how-to's</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael HÃ¼ttermann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2008/11/intellij-idea-8-refactorings-wrap-return-value/#comment-73893</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael HÃ¼ttermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=230#comment-73893</guid>
		<description>A wonderful refactoring, but a misleading example. If I have a getter for a class member and would like to refactor the return value .. won't the refactoring "Type Migration" even better to use? OK, this one would not create the new class, but it converts the getter, a hopefully existing setter and the type of the class member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful refactoring, but a misleading example. If I have a getter for a class member and would like to refactor the return value .. won&#8217;t the refactoring &#8220;Type Migration&#8221; even better to use? OK, this one would not create the new class, but it converts the getter, a hopefully existing setter and the type of the class member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
