http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/ tips & tricks, news, how-to's Mon, 21 May 2012 07:46:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/#comment-115607 Bas Leijdekkers Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:23:46 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1763#comment-115607 This inspection and intention will work with any interface whose name ends with Listener which has an abstract subclass that implements this interface whose name ends with Adapter. Thus this will work for your Adapters and Listeners too. This inspection and intention will work with any interface whose name ends with Listener which has an abstract subclass that implements this interface whose name ends with Adapter. Thus this will work for your Adapters and Listeners too.

]]> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/#comment-115532 Esko Luontola Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:38:42 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1763#comment-115532 Will this work with any interfaces, such as those in the current project and its libraries, or only those that are part of the JDK? In theory it should be possible to detect adapter classes - they have an empty implementation of all (or most) methods of an interface. Will this work with any interfaces, such as those in the current project and its libraries, or only those that are part of the JDK? In theory it should be possible to detect adapter classes - they have an empty implementation of all (or most) methods of an interface.

]]> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/#comment-115502 Gleb Mazovetskiy Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:11:22 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1763#comment-115502 If I have an XListener and an XAdapter will this inspection work? Basically, is this a naming convention based feature? If I have an XListener and an XAdapter will this inspection work?
Basically, is this a naming convention based feature?

]]> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/#comment-115460 Michael Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:44:20 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1763#comment-115460 This is nice. I have needed this on many occasions! There have been times I have implemented the listener then decided I just need the adapter because I only really need 1 or 2 methods implemented. Tedious. Awesome new addition! This is nice. I have needed this on many occasions! There have been times I have implemented the listener then decided I just need the adapter because I only really need 1 or 2 methods implemented. Tedious. Awesome new addition!

]]> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/listeners-and-adapters/#comment-115458 Vaclav Slovacek Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:44:30 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1763#comment-115458 Maybe the new closure folding could be used here as well to hide unused methods? Maybe the new closure folding could be used here as well to hide unused methods?

]]>