<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Completion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/</link>
	<description>tips &#38; tricks, news, how-to's</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/#comment-131258</link>
		<dc:creator>IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1848#comment-131258</guid>
		<description>Can you make it (code complete) auto without press shortcut?
Visual Studio 2008 do it that way.

And "quick document lookup", eclipse shows the doc on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you make it (code complete) auto without press shortcut?<br />
Visual Studio 2008 do it that way.</p>
<p>And &#8220;quick document lookup&#8221;, eclipse shows the doc on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gromov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/#comment-116397</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gromov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1848#comment-116397</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

I think that the current behavior should remain unchanged. As for superset, subtyping and others, we can provide such variants on second smart completion in the same place. It could also fill unknown arguments with formal parameter names, like Eclipse does. We could also run live template for all the parameters. The same could be done when completing method name in a call, though it seems a bit controversial. I'm not sure which subset of these features is really worth implementing. Every variant has its disadvantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>I think that the current behavior should remain unchanged. As for superset, subtyping and others, we can provide such variants on second smart completion in the same place. It could also fill unknown arguments with formal parameter names, like Eclipse does. We could also run live template for all the parameters. The same could be done when completing method name in a call, though it seems a bit controversial. I&#8217;m not sure which subset of these features is really worth implementing. Every variant has its disadvantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Kirpichov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/#comment-116385</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Kirpichov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1848#comment-116385</guid>
		<description>How about supporting the case where the called method has a signature that is a superset of the current method's signature, possibly with respect to subtyping in parameters? (the user would then be left to fill in the missing arguments) For example, 'this(..)' constructor delegation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about supporting the case where the called method has a signature that is a superset of the current method&#8217;s signature, possibly with respect to subtyping in parameters? (the user would then be left to fill in the missing arguments) For example, &#8216;this(..)&#8217; constructor delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gromov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/#comment-115907</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gromov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1848#comment-115907</guid>
		<description>Stephen, done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Friedrich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/09/super-method-completion/#comment-115900</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Friedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=1848#comment-115900</guid>
		<description>Please make it work with delegation, too!

IMHO it should even work in any case where the called method has the same signature as the current method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make it work with delegation, too!</p>
<p>IMHO it should even work in any case where the called method has the same signature as the current method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

