<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JetBrains Contributes to Open Source at Devoxx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/</link>
	<description>tips &#38; tricks, news, how-to's</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/#comment-205148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=6123#comment-205148</guid>
		<description>It was a great session, thanks Peter, thanks Hamlet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great session, thanks Peter, thanks Hamlet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gromov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/#comment-204909</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gromov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=6123#comment-204909</guid>
		<description>Frankly, as Hamlet wrote, the intention have been there for some years, so you can use it, just put your caret on the &#038;&#038; sign and press Alt+Enter.

Stephen, that was a typo, thanks for spotting! Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, as Hamlet wrote, the intention have been there for some years, so you can use it, just put your caret on the &#038;&#038; sign and press Alt+Enter.</p>
<p>Stephen, that was a typo, thanks for spotting! Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Friedrich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/#comment-204887</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Friedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=6123#comment-204887</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't the inverted if contain a negation??
   if (!a) {
At least that's the way the intention works in Java - it does not change the semantics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the inverted if contain a negation??<br />
   if (!a) {<br />
At least that&#8217;s the way the intention works in Java - it does not change the semantics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2011/11/jetbrains-contributes-to-open-source-at-devoxx/#comment-204879</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/?p=6123#comment-204879</guid>
		<description>That "Split If" intention is one that I've wanted in Java from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8220;Split If&#8221; intention is one that I&#8217;ve wanted in Java from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

