Comments on: Welcome to JetBrains MPS Blog http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/ JetBrains Meta Programming System Team Blog Mon, 21 May 2012 09:38:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Aviram http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-32 Aviram Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:22:01 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-32 aaaahhhhhhhh, zee secret word :) thanks, topka aaaahhhhhhhh, zee secret word :)
thanks, topka

]]> By: topka http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-31 topka Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:37:37 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-31 @Aviram: You can export the "one page" User Guide to PDF http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/MPS/MPS+User%27s+Guide+(one+page) Use Tools -> Export to PDF @Aviram: You can export the “one page” User Guide to PDF
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/MPS/MPS+User%27s+Guide+(one+page)
Use Tools -> Export to PDF

]]> By: Aviram http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-30 Aviram Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:06:12 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-30 any chance to have http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/MPS/MPS+User%27s+Guide in a PDF format or at least in a single HTML page? it's a bit uncomfortable any chance to have http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/MPS/MPS+User%27s+Guide in a PDF format or at least in a single HTML page?
it’s a bit uncomfortable

]]> By: Marek Mosiewicz http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-21 Marek Mosiewicz Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:45:06 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-21 MPS seems to be great idea. BUT it must have a parser. I understand that sometimes it can be ambigous but it many cases it will be not. And most people would try to design language in that way that it would be not. For them the parser is must be feautre. DSL means Domain specific Language, not domain specific AST. MPS seems to be great idea. BUT it must have a parser. I understand that sometimes it can be ambigous but it many cases it will be not. And most people would try to design language in that way that it would be not.
For them the parser is must be feautre. DSL means Domain specific Language, not domain specific AST.

]]> By: t dsl http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-14 t dsl Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:14:43 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-14 <strong>t dsl...</strong> Good post. I am looking into these issues on my blog.... t dsl…

Good post. I am looking into these issues on my blog….

]]> By: Dmitri Nesteruk http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-10 Dmitri Nesteruk Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:24 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-10 DSL design is by definition complex, and I keep maintaining that it's not for anybody. That's not a bad thing - it just means that people who are truly interested in it will have to spend more time to get acquainted with it. So I'll take a shot at working with MPS and see what comes of it. DSL design is by definition complex, and I keep maintaining that it’s not for anybody. That’s not a bad thing - it just means that people who are truly interested in it will have to spend more time to get acquainted with it. So I’ll take a shot at working with MPS and see what comes of it.

]]> By: Igor Alshannikov http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-9 Igor Alshannikov Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:18:14 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-9 Thanks for the feedback. The issue of adoption is very important. I've re-posted your opinion to mps forum: http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/279140 Thanks for the feedback.
The issue of adoption is very important.
I’ve re-posted your opinion to mps forum: http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/279140

]]> By: minh http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2008/12/welcome-to-jetbrains-mps-blog/#comment-8 minh Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:16:29 +0000 http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=3#comment-8 MPS adoption. after using mps, i found it to be quite complex. although i think it a great idea and quite powerful, i think the learning curve is too large. I think a lot of the features needs to be removed becasue it is quite overwhelming. if it had a more narrow focus and did it quite well, and then expand, i think it would be much easier to expand and you would be able to change the application based on demands of programmers. MPS adoption.

after using mps, i found it to be quite complex. although i think it a great idea and quite powerful, i think the learning curve is too large. I think a lot of the features needs to be removed becasue it is quite overwhelming.

if it had a more narrow focus and did it quite well, and then expand, i think it would be much easier to expand and you would be able to change the application based on demands of programmers.

]]>