<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intervals in MPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2009/03/intervals-in-mps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2009/03/intervals-in-mps/</link>
	<description>JetBrains Meta Programming System Team Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2009/03/intervals-in-mps/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=102#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&#62; Have you tried our editor? 
Of course I did.

&#62; Why do you think it is horrible?
I said that it is *for me* :). 

I like the idea of MPS very much - from the first moment I've read the initial article about it a few years ago. 

The problem (for me) is that MPS as a tool looks and behaves very complicated and non-intuitive at all - for me it's the total opposite of what IntelliJ is (the most intuitive IDE existing right now).

And now if this is extremely complicated for me as a developer do you think a domain expert would manage to use it?  I don't think so.

Reading the initial article about MPS I thought that MPS as a tool would allow to "generate" something like your dead product Fabrique - a sort of environment with more DSLs to solve a concrete problem. Each DSL would have it's own view and editors (like Fabrique had), but these "editors" would be different from DSL to DSL. E.g. in the case of Fabrique, the Domain Model was edited with a ER Diagram Editor, the View with a WYSIWYG, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Have you tried our editor?<br />
Of course I did.</p>
<p>&gt; Why do you think it is horrible?<br />
I said that it is *for me* :). </p>
<p>I like the idea of MPS very much - from the first moment I&#8217;ve read the initial article about it a few years ago. </p>
<p>The problem (for me) is that MPS as a tool looks and behaves very complicated and non-intuitive at all - for me it&#8217;s the total opposite of what IntelliJ is (the most intuitive IDE existing right now).</p>
<p>And now if this is extremely complicated for me as a developer do you think a domain expert would manage to use it?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Reading the initial article about MPS I thought that MPS as a tool would allow to &#8220;generate&#8221; something like your dead product Fabrique - a sort of environment with more DSLs to solve a concrete problem. Each DSL would have it&#8217;s own view and editors (like Fabrique had), but these &#8220;editors&#8221; would be different from DSL to DSL. E.g. in the case of Fabrique, the Domain Model was edited with a ER Diagram Editor, the View with a WYSIWYG, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin Solomatov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2009/03/intervals-in-mps/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin Solomatov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=102#comment-55</guid>
		<description>2Joseph Have you tried our editor? Why do you think it is horrible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2Joseph Have you tried our editor? Why do you think it is horrible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/2009/03/intervals-in-mps/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/?p=102#comment-54</guid>
		<description>This looks very nice.
I wish such syntax where available in the smart IntelliJ editor (that cell based editor looks horrible and complicated for me :( - I don't think domain experts will use it :( ).

Please keep posting more often about MPS (like it's happening lately with the IDEA blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks very nice.<br />
I wish such syntax where available in the smart IntelliJ editor (that cell based editor looks horrible and complicated for me <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> - I don&#8217;t think domain experts will use it <img src='http://blogs.jetbrains.com/mps/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>Please keep posting more often about MPS (like it&#8217;s happening lately with the IDEA blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
